Contact
Inquiries directed to artificialintelligencesystemsauthority.com are handled through a structured intake process designed to route technical, regulatory, editorial, and research questions to appropriate subject-matter channels. This page describes how the office processes incoming requests, what response timelines apply, and which categories of inquiry fall within the scope of this authority's coverage.
Response expectations
Requests submitted through this office are categorized into 4 primary inquiry types before routing: technical reference questions, regulatory and policy clarifications, editorial corrections, and research or media inquiries. Each category carries distinct handling protocols based on the specificity and verifiability requirements the AI systems sector demands.
Technical reference questions — for example, those touching on AI system components and architecture, performance evaluation metrics, or standards and certifications — are assessed against named public frameworks such as NIST AI 100-1 (the AI Risk Management Framework) and ISO/IEC 42001 before a response is prepared. Requests that require verification against federal regulatory publications, including materials from the Federal Trade Commission or the National Institute of Standards and Technology, may require additional processing time.
Standard response timelines:
- Editorial corrections (factual errors, broken citations, outdated statutory references): 3–5 business days
- Technical reference questions (framework interpretations, classification questions, sector-specific AI deployment): 5–7 business days
- Regulatory and policy clarifications (questions referencing specific statutes, agency guidance, or executive orders): 7–10 business days
- Research and media inquiries (requests for data context, sector overviews, or sourced background): 10–14 business days
Submissions that do not fall cleanly into one of these 4 categories are reviewed by the editorial intake team and assigned to the closest applicable channel within 2 business days of receipt.
Additional contact options
Inquiries related to specific verticals within the AI systems sector may benefit from referencing the relevant topical reference pages before submitting a request. For questions concerning AI deployment in regulated industries, the pages covering artificial intelligence systems in healthcare, artificial intelligence systems in finance, and artificial intelligence systems in legal services provide sector-specific frameworks, applicable regulatory bodies, and named standards.
For questions involving ethics, accountability, and governance — areas addressed by the OECD AI Principles and the White House Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights — the pages on AI ethics and responsible AI, AI bias and fairness in systems, and AI regulation and policy in the United States consolidate the primary reference material.
Researchers requiring definitional groundwork before submitting specialized questions are directed to the AI system glossary of terms and the overview of AI research institutions and organizations in the US.
How to reach this office
Correspondence is accepted through the contact form embedded within this page's template. When submitting a request, including the following information reduces processing time:
Incomplete submissions — those lacking a clear subject scope or source reference — are returned with a clarification request rather than placed into the processing queue. This policy maintains the accuracy standards required for a reference authority operating across a sector governed by frameworks including NIST SP 800-53 and the evolving requirements of state-level AI legislation active in jurisdictions including California (AB 2013, SB 1047) and Colorado (SB 21-169).
Service area covered
Artificialintelligencesystemsauthority.com operates at national scope, with primary coverage of the United States AI systems landscape. This includes federal regulatory developments from agencies such as the FTC, NIST, and the Department of Commerce, as well as cross-sector deployment contexts spanning the 50 states.
The authority's coverage encompasses the full stack of AI system types documented across this reference network — from machine learning and deep learning architectures through natural language processing, computer vision, generative AI systems, and autonomous decision-making systems. Sector coverage extends to 8 named industries: healthcare, finance, manufacturing, education, legal services, retail and e-commerce, transportation, and cybersecurity.
Inquiries originating outside the United States are accepted when they concern US-based regulatory frameworks, federal agency guidance, or standards bodies with formal US participation — including NIST, the IEEE Standards Association, and the Partnership on AI. Requests involving exclusively foreign legal regimes or non-US regulatory bodies fall outside the primary scope and will be noted as such in the response.
Report a Data Error or Correction
Found incorrect information, an outdated fact, or a broken link? Use the form below.
References
- Department of Commerce
- FTC
- Federal Trade Commission
- NIST
- NIST AI 100-1 (the AI Risk Management Framework)
- NIST SP 800-53
- White House Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights
- IEEE Standards Association
- ISO/IEC 42001
- Partnership on AI